Huntron Users Support Forum

Huntron User Support Forums => Out of Production Hardware => Topic started by: mbdmtrasdl on June 12, 2014, 06:55:11 AM

Title: Huntron 2000
Post by: mbdmtrasdl on June 12, 2014, 06:55:11 AM
Just wondered what the difference might be between Huntron 2000, 2000A, and 2000B ....is there any difference to operator usage?
thanks
mike
Title: Re: Huntron 2000
Post by: admin on June 12, 2014, 07:09:30 AM
They are functionally all the same. The 2000B was slightly different in that the 400Hz frequency could be set internally to be 200Hz. This was a change for the US Navy who wanted the range to match the Tracker 5100DS which used a set 200Hz frequency.
Title: Re: Huntron 2000
Post by: jamesbtex on July 10, 2014, 10:05:27 AM
Besides the Navy requirement, is there any advantage functionally between the 400hz (2000A) and 200hz (2000B)?
Is one better then the other?

James
Title: Tracker 2000A verses 2000B question.
Post by: jamesbtex on July 10, 2014, 10:09:56 AM
I understand that the 2000A and 2000B are functionally the same and that the 2000A had a frequency of 400hz and the 2000B had a frequency of 200hz due to a Navy requirement.

Which is more useful the 400hz or 200hz frequencies?
Are there any issues with either when it comes to identifying circuit faults?

James
Title: Re: Huntron 2000
Post by: admin on July 10, 2014, 11:12:42 AM
No advantage unless you are looking for a specific frequency requirement.

I have merged this topic with another dealing with the same topic.
Thanks.
Admin